Wednesday, June 3, 2020
One Identity, Two Parts - Literature Essay Samples
The emotional heart of Helena Maria Viramontes novel, Under the Feet of Jesus, revolves around the mental, physical, and spiritual coming-of-age of Estrella, a 13-year-old Latina girl living with her family on a migrant labor farm. As a foil to Estrellas transformation, Viramontes presents us with another characterââ¬âPetra, Estrellas mother, who demonstrates immense courage in the face of the same oppression as Estrella, but who processes her frustrations in the opposite way of her daughter, contrasting the externalized, action-based feistiness of Estrella with the internal, faith-based perseverance of her mother. In the grand scheme of the novel, Estrellas agency is not distillable to one single moment or actionââ¬âit is built up over the course of Under the Feet of Jesus, resulting in a turning point that represents the infinite moments, realizations, and frustrations that she experiences before it. This gradual coming of age process mirrors, and is intertwined with, Estrellas recovery from the loss of her father, which is first example of emotional growth we see in Estrella. Early in chapter one, we are introduced to the character of the father through flashbacks, a character whose absence distinguishes his role in the story more than his actions themselves. At the beginning of the novel, Estrella still struggles with her fathers abandonment: ââ¬Å"[Is] he waiting like I am?â⬠(22). With no possibility of an answer, Estrella considers her own process of realization, mimicking the emotional growth and coming-of-age that she undergoes later in the novel;ââ¬Å"It didnââ¬â¢t happe n so fast, the realization that he was not coming back. Estrella didnââ¬â¢t wake up one day knowing what she knew now. It came upon her as it did her mother. Like morning light, passing, the absence of night, just there, his not returningâ⬠(22). Not only does she struggle with past childhood emotional trauma and the reconciliation of newfound knowledgeââ¬âEstrella also begins to subconsciously question her current paradigm. In the first and second chapters, it is subtle, seemingly insignificant thoughts that foreshadow the heavier emotional growth that occurs in future chapters. While walking home one night, Estrella cant ââ¬Å"remember which side she was on and which side of the wire mesh she was safe inâ⬠(54). The mental clarity that oblivion allows children begins to fade as Estrella is forced to accept more responsibility on behalf of her family; she struggles to remember the black-and-white, good-vs-evil paradigm of her youth. Her perception of her reality begins to shift. Even in the baseball game she passes, Estrella cant help but question whats really going onââ¬â ââ¬Å"the floodlights aimed at the phantoms in the field. Or were the lights directed at her? Could the spectators see her from where she s tood?â⬠This prompts her to ask, among a seemingly unrelated flurry of questions, ââ¬Å"Where was home?â⬠(54). It is the subconscious examination of roles in the baseball game that connects this question to the ones before itââ¬âwe see the seeds of Estrellas coming of age process starting to grow. In processing her frustration with the realities of her circumstances, Estrella externalizes her emotionsââ¬âshe literally forms a second self as part of her identity, and refers to it when acting upon her newfound consciousness. In chapter four, we first see the formation of this second self, when Estrella uses a crowbar to demand her familys money back from the nurse, highlighting the separation between her childhood obedience and newly-awoken adolescent consciousness; ââ¬Å"one was a silent phantom who obediently marked a circle with a stick around the bungalow as the mother had requested, while the other held the crowbar and the moneyâ⬠(123). Viramontes explicitly relates this mental separation to a moment of extreme clarityââ¬âthe moment when Estrella realizes that ââ¬Å"the nurse owed them as much as they owed herâ⬠. (121) This mental clarity is indivisible from Estrellas subsequent actions. It is her recognition of her oppression that spearheads her emotio nal growth, and brings into focus her second self. If chapter four shows us the turning point, the moment of separation, chapter five shows us a more seamless integration of this second self: ââ¬Å"Okay, she said to her other selfâ⬠(139). This casual inclusion of the second self illustrates the initial shock of a split identity being replaced with acceptance, cooperation, a willingness to embrace her mental awakening. ââ¬Å"There was no turning back now,â⬠Estrella remarks, illustrating a change in perspective, and a forward progression in the coming of age process (139). No longer does Estrella ââ¬Å"stumble blindly,â⬠neither while physically climbing the old barn on her land nor while facing the facets and frustrations of her reality as the daughter of an immigrant family at a labor camp (141). Petra, on the other hand, internalizes these frustrations. Faced with the glaring reality of her circumstances, she remains aware of her oppression, but unlike her daughter, she avoids confrontation with her oppressors. In the first chapter, we learn though a flashback that Petra originally lied about her ex-husbands abandonment to Estrella because Petra knew that ââ¬Å"the truth was only a lesser degree of liesâ⬠; this quote allows us insight into the perspective with which Petra examines her reality (24). As a mother of 5, Petra has obviously had her own coming-of-age. Ironically, even though Estrella is the one who must create a second self to deal with the mental upheaval that accompanies coming-of-age, it is Petra who is literally carrying a second selfââ¬âthe unborn baby inside of her, which likely informs the internalization of her anger for the sake of protecting her babys future. Because of her age and experience, Petra is able to paint a more nuanced, informed picture of her reality than Estrella is, which then affects how she teaches her children about the world. When Estrella expresses her fears about the border patrol, Petra tells her, ââ¬Å"Donââ¬â¢t let them make you feel you did a crime for picking the vegetables theyââ¬â¢ll be eating for dinner,â⬠knowledge that progresses Estrellas own coming-of-age narrative (57). Petra and Estrella begin to share the same frustrations and realizations about their circumstances, though their mechanisms for processing this knowledge differ, with Estrellas action-based externalization and Petras faith-based internalization. When faced with this difference, Petra acknowledges, once again, that there is nothing she can do to stop another forceââ¬âEstrellaââ¬âfrom acting out how she deems fit: if Petra had ââ¬Å"learned anything in her thirty-five years,â⬠it was that ââ¬Å"her two hands couldn ââ¬â¢t hold anything back, including timeâ⬠(100). The difference between Estrella and Petras own methods for dealing with their respective ââ¬Å"conscience awakeningsâ⬠allows the novel to maintain a character dynamic that supports the idea of a nuanced reality, without obvious heroes or villains or a simplification of complex issues. In Under the Feet of Jesus, Estrella and Petra might influence each other, and carry similar experiences, but how they react to these experiences demonstrates much more about their characters than their age or knowledge alone. Petra offers us a reserved, internalized perspective, one that practices confrontation through radical devotion rather than action. Estrella, on the other hand, embraces what is outside of herself, and through her coming-of-age transformation, steps boldly up to the plate, armed with newfound agency, ready to practice radical action in defense of her integrity instead.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.